FLOW to Michigan Officials: Sideline the Study and Stop the Oil

State is legally obligated to take action protecting Great Lakes from “Line 5” oil spill in Mackinac Straits

shareShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInPin on Pinterest

 

FLOW today submitted formal public comments on the State of Michigan’s 337-page Alternative Analysis for the Straits Pipeline,” calling on state officials to scrap the fatally flawed study and stop Line 5’s oil because of Enbridge’s repeated violations of the 1953 easement allowing the pipelines to occupy the bottom of the Mackinac Straits.

FLOW Comments on the Draft Alternatives Analysis

Rick Kane's "Comments on the Dynamic Risk Report: Draft Final Report - Alternatives Analysis for the Straits Pipeline"

Rick Kane's "Defining a Worst-Case Scenario for the Enbridge Crude Oil Pipelines Crossing the Straits of Mackinac"

Gary Street's "The Worst-Case Scenario for a Rupture of Enbridge Line 5 at the Straits of Mackinac"

Dr. Ed Timm's "An Analysis of Errors and Omissions in the Dynamic Risk, Inc. Line 5 Alternatives Analysis, Option 5"

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

State is legally obligated to take action protecting Great Lakes from “Line 5” oil spill in Mackinac Straits